Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Google Earth with KML search may not be an SDI, but it sure as hell looks like a data or service catalog killer. If every W*S published a KML document like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.1"> <Document> <Feature> <LatLonAltBox> <north>50.0</north> <south>30.0</south> <east>-100.0</east> <west>-120.0</west> </LatLonAltBox> <description> <![CDATA[ <h3>Example Web Map Service</h3> <p> This is a KML feature that points to the web map service at example.com. </p> <p> <a href="http://example.com/wms/" rel="alternate" > W*S Service Online Resource URL </a> </p> <p>Keywords <ul> <li>physiography</li> <li>hydrography</li> </ul> </p> ]]> </description> ... </Feature> </Document> </kml>
we would be able to discover services using Google Earth, or by searching the index of a yet-to-be-developed, open KML crawler.
Comments
Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Allan
And then a great wailing and gnashing of teeth arose from the semweb crowd...Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Sean
Wailing about the "alternate" link type? Then let's define a new one. It may look like I'm attaching new semantics to <ul> and <li>, but those are just for humans readers. The link (<a>) is the important part.Re: Imagine a Geo-Web Without Catalogs
Author: Allan
I don't know.. I like the human-readable stuff. I was thinking maybe some people would want to see more things like capabilities XML or 19119 metadata. But they can go ahead and do that. Overall, I think it's great that people can play around with using KML like this.